Insulation Outlook Magazine
The Monthly Magazine Devoted to the Industrial and Specialty Insulation Industry
Access Plug Flange
Aeroflex
Corick Valve Covers
Industrial Insulation Group
Johns Manville
Lewco Specialty Products, Inc.
Owens Corning
Polyguard Products
Rock Wool Manufacturing Co.
3M / Venture Tape Corp.
Armacell, LLC
Auburn Manufacturing, Inc.
Distribution International
Extol of Ohio, Inc.
MFM Building Products
Midwest Fasteners
Performance Contracting Inc
Pittsburgh Corning
Proto Corporation
Roxul
Unifrax I, LLC

Insulation Outlook Advertisers
Click logo for more information.

Subscriptions

Advertise

Current Content

Write for Outlook

2014 Advertisers

Browse Archives

Reprints/Back Issues

About Us

Social Media

Contact Us

NIA

IO Home

Print This Page Printable Version   Order Back IssueBuy Magazine Issue Containing This Article


DISCLAIMER: Unless specifically noted at the beginning of the article, the content, calculations, and opinions expressed by the author(s) of any article in Insulation Outlook are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NIA. The appearance of an article, advertisements, and/or product or service information in Insulation Outlook does not constitute an endorsement of such products or services by NIA. The information is provided as a reference service only, and no claims for technical accuracy can be guaranteed. Material may have become outdated since publication. The user may want to verify the technical accuracy prior to use of this information. The article may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. To reprint this information, contact the NIA offices.

Perspectives on Water Vapor Permeance of Mechanical Insulation Systems

By Biju Thomas

Insulation material comparison often involves contrasting the physical properties of the materials as represented on the products' data sheets. Going through this exercise, it is important to be sure that the physical properties being compared are tested to the same test method and procedure, and the values are expressed in the same units. If not, one is comparing apples to oranges, resulting in an inaccurate analysis of materials. It also is essential to understand the effect that the physical property will have on the insulation performance in relation to the units of measure.

A good example of the importance of understanding physical property terms is in defining a material's ability to resist penetration of moisture from the air. Water vapor permeability and permeance are both measures of a material's ability to resist penetration of moisture from the air. The terms are defined in ASTM Standard C168 ? 10, "Standard Terminology Relating to Thermal Insulation" as follows:

Water vapor permeability - the time rate of water vapor transmission through unit area of flat material of unit thickness induced by unit vapor pressure difference between two specific surfaces, under specified temperature and humidity conditions.

Water vapor permeance - the time rate of water vapor transmission through unit area of flat material or construction induced by unit vapor pressure difference between two specific surfaces, under specified temperature and humidity conditions.

Permeability is measured in units of perms-inch and is used to compare materials that are typically used in a variety of thicknesses (¼" or greater). Permeance is measured in units of perms and is used to describe thinner materials (e.g., jacketing products) that are used in the field in the exact thickness at which the material is tested.

A similar relationship exists between the terms used to define thermal conductivity: k-factor and R-value. The unit to describe k-factor is defined at a standard thickness of per 1". This allows an end user to compare materials on an equal basis, regardless of thickness. In contrast, R-value is a measure of the material in the thickness it is used in the field, and varies depending on the referenced thickness. In regards to units used to measure moisture penetration resistance, permeability is similar to the k-factor, and permeance is similar to the R-value. A material with a permeability listed as 1.0 perm-inch would have a permeance of 1.33 at ¾" thickness (1.0/.75 = 1.33). For moisture penetration resistance values, the smaller the number, the better the value.

Derived moisture penetration resistance results can be converted from one term to the other using appropriate conversion factors (referenced in the table on page 29).

A common test method to measure this property is ASTM E96, "Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials." Two test procedures (see images above) are called out in the Standard: wet cup (Procedure A) and dry cup (Procedure B). Both procedures start by conditioning, measuring thickness, and weighing the sample. For the wet cup method, the sample is placed over a pan with water in it and the edges sealed.  For the dry cup method, the sample is placed over a pan with a desiccant in it and the edges sealed. The pans are then placed in an environmental chamber at a specified temperature and humidity, and weighed daily, until the weight gain or loss reaches equilibrium (shown in the chart on page 29). At this time, the permeability or permeance of the material can be established. For some insulation or jacketing materials, the procedure used can make a slight difference in the stated value. Hence, to be sure one is comparing apples to apples, one should use values obtained from the same procedure (which should be stated on the product's technical data sheet).

It also is important to understand the significance of both the physical property itself and the value stated. One of the key determining factors to consider when evaluating the significance of a test value is the precision of the test. A result that goes beyond what the test can accurately measure does not provide added value. Also, the definition of what constitutes a good value, "low perm" in this case, often changes over time. Further, within the permeability or permeance value, one should consider the value of the entire system?specifically, how much weight should be placed on the permeability of the material itself versus the permeability of the seams. For example, aluminum jacketing has a very low permeance, but if the seams are not properly sealed, the system loses much of its integrity so that no matter how good the jacketing is, the overall insulation system may not perform as expected. In most cases, slight differences in permeability would require many years to make a difference in the performance of the system, even if the percentage change may seem large. Other factors probably would play a much greater role, such as damage to the jacket or insulation.

Another key point to understand is what effect the property will have on the performance of the insulation. Permeability is primarily an issue with insulation on low-temperature lines where humidity is high over long periods of time. On systems that do not have these conditions, permeability will not be a key consideration. The lower the line temperature and the higher the humidity, the greater the importance will be. Hence, in Florida and the Gulf States, it can be a key factor. Over time, with highly permeable materials, air with moisture will come in contact with the cold pipe and form condensation between the pipe and the insulation. The moisture creates wet insulation, which increases the chances for pipe corrosion, mold growth, and degradation of the insulation's thermal conductivity, resulting in insulation and system failure. This situation is severe and would warrant removal of the insulation. However, this is a long, slow process taking years to develop. In contrast, if there is evidence of moisture between the insulation and the pipe in a short period of time, the cause is almost always an open seam or termination point where moisture-laden air can travel unabated to the cold pipe and form condensation.

In summary, there are typically several ways to describe a material's performance, including its ability to resist penetration of moisture from the air. When comparing products or determining if a material meets a specification requirement, one must pay careful attention to the units and identified test method. There are many reasons why it is important to understand the physical property terms used to describe or compare materials and to be sure one is comparing like terms expressed in the same units. Further, it is vital to understand the effect that a particular property has on the performance of the insulation system.


This article appeared in the February 2013 issue of Insulation Outlook.

  • Subscribe to Insulation Outlook magazine
  • Want to respond to this article? Interested in authoring an article for a future issue of Insulation Outlook? Contact the Editor

Author

Biju Thomas

Biju Thomas, research and development manager for K-FLEX USA, is experienced in the manufacturing and testing process for mechanical insulation products. Biju is an active member of ASTM and has a degree in polymer science and rubber technology engineering. He can be reached at biju.thomas@kflexusa.com.

  
Click Photo to Enlarge
Figure 1
Figure 1



Figure 2
Figure 2



Figure 3
Figure 3






National Insulation Association About Us | Subscriptions | Media Kit | Archived Articles | Editorial Feedback | Writers | Reprints | Trademarks and Terms of Use PDF | Privacy Policy PDF | NIA | IO Home