DISCLAIMER: Unless specifically noted at the beginning of the article, the content, calculations, and opinions expressed by the author(s) of any article in Insulation Outlook are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NIA. The appearance of an article, advertisements, and/or product or service information in Insulation Outlook does not constitute an endorsement of such products or services by NIA. The information is provided as a reference service only, and no claims for technical accuracy can be guaranteed. Material may have become outdated since publication. The user may want to verify the technical accuracy prior to use of this information. The article may not be reproduced in any means, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of the publisher and NIA. To reprint this information, contact the NIA offices.
The evolution of closed cell elastomeric foam, first developed in the early 1900s, has had a dramatic impact on the insulation industry. The most notable reason for this is its high moisture resistance, the result of its cellular structure—millions of tiny barriers that resist the migration of liquid. This characteristic not only minimizes the threats associated with moisture (such as mold), but it also ensures steady, long-term thermal performance. Liquid has a high heat transference capability; hence, wet insulation provides very little insulation at all. Closed cell elastomeric foam has strong water vapor permeability to resist moisture absorption, so neither its performance nor its durability is impaired by the presence of moisture in a heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC), plumbing, or refrigeration system.
Elastomeric foam insulation was developed in the 1950s. The introduction of this and other polymer-based materials marked an important industry transition from the use of natural materials, such as cork, to the use of synthetic materials and chemicals. The popularity of elastomeric insulation grew quickly, primarily because it eliminated the need for any type of vapor barrier to prevent the transference of moisture. As availability of the insulation in various forms (including sheets, rolls, and tubes) increased, so did its popularity as an insulator, especially in refrigeration piping and ductwork applications. It was a user-friendly alternative to other materials because it could be bonded reliably to a variety of surfaces, it was easy to install, and its performance could not be compromised by tears or punctures.
Demand for elastomeric foam has increased sharply over the last 2 decades due to heightened awareness of indoor air quality (IAQ). Since elastomeric foam does not contain formaldehyde or fibers, and has very low volatile organic compounds (VOCs), it has found wide acceptance among IAQ advocates. Because of its non-particulating, smooth surface and moisture resistance, elastomeric foam does not support the growth of mold—arguably one of the most devastating IAQ problems that facilities face.
The Manufacturing Process
The three main components used in the manufacturing of elastomeric closed cell foam insulation include the following:
These components are combined in a large mixer, typically in batches of 500 pounds or more. The mixture is then put through extruding equipment to form a particular profile or shape, typically either a round tube or a flat sheet. The profile is heated in an oven to a specific temperature, a process that causes the chemical foaming agent to change from a solid to a gas. When this occurs, thousands of tiny air pockets (cells)—all of which are connected—form. The profile is carefully cooled to ensure that these cells remain unbroken and intact, maintaining the material’s closed cell structure. It is then cut to size and packaged for shipment.
Elastomeric foams are made without the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), or hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), making them suitable for the toughest environmental specifications.
Closed cell elastomeric foam has been successfully used as pipe insulation since it was patented in 1954. Available in a wide range of shapes and thicknesses, elastomeric foam can be easily manipulated to fit snugly around all kinds of equipment, from residential piping to large commercial chillers. There are closed cell elastomeric foams that meet all of the code requirements, fire ratings, noise blocking, and efficiency standards for a variety of applications, including the following:
Refrigeration piping, hot and cold water lines, and chilled water piping
Interior and exterior duct systems
Mechanical systems in industrial, pharmaceutical, and marine and offshore applications
Over the years, there have been several advances in the production of elastomeric foam, making it suitable for particularly demanding applications. These advances include:
a non-halogen foam suitable for use on stainless steel at high-temperature applications (up to 250ºF);
high-temperature foams suitable for up to 300ºF;
availability of more colors, including white, which saves users the extra time and expense of priming or painting on indoor applications; and
laminated products for exterior applications where insulation would be subjected to ultraviolet (UV) exposure, weather, and physical abuse.
Perhaps one of the most exciting advances in elastomeric foam is the recent availability of insulation with a built-in antimicrobial additive.
Moisture resistance remains closed cell elastomeric foam insulation’s strongest selling point when compared to other insulating materials. This also makes it great for below ambient applications, where condensation is an issue. Solid thermal performance, user-friendly installation, durability, and appealing IAQ characteristics make it suitable for the full range of HVAC, refrigeration, and plumbing applications. The product will not absorb moisture, or trap dirt or debris that supports the growth of mold. It is a fiber-free, formaldehyde-free, low-VOC material, so it is a good candidate for those facilities that are especially concerned with IAQ.
This article appeared in the March 2008
issue of Insulation Outlook.
Want to respond to this article? Interested in authoring an article for a future issue of Insulation Outlook? Contact the Editor
Mike Resetar is the Technical Manager, Mechanical/Technical Insulation Armacell in Mebane, North Carolina. He has been directly involved with mechanical insulation for the past 28 years. For the past 5 years, he has held the Technical Manager position, and his experience includes manufacturing at various Armacell plants in North America. He is an active member of ASHRAE, ASTM, IECC, and NIA and is currently the Chairman of NIA’s Technical Information Committee. He can be reached at 919-304-8908 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Click Photo to Enlarge
All properties are for the generic material type and will vary by grade and by manufacturer. All properties should be verified with individual manufacturers. Properties that are not stated may or may not be an indication that a material is not appropriate for applications depending on that property. This should be verified with the specific manufacturer.
Surface burning characteristics are valid for 1-inch thickness; verify results for type and any other thickness with the manufacturer.
When a property is out of the specified usage range, it is shown by N/A3. Properties that are not listed or stated are so shown.
All properties listed are for the core insulation material only and may not be indicative of the performance of an insulation system, including vapor retarders, adhesives, and sealants.
Many materials can be used for applications outside of the ranges listed, but additional precautions must be followed. The specific manufacturer should be consulted for detailed recommendations.
Some values, such as specific thermal conductivities at various mean temperatures, may be interpolated value.
This chart has been established for products with current ASTM standards.